Gaming Netflix
March 6, 2007
I don’t rate movies based on what I think of them. I rate them based on whether I think I would like similar movies. I do this all the time, rating certain mediocre things as good and rating other mediocre things as awful. It basically comes down to this: I don’t trust their ratings algorithm to accurately identify what I like from accurate ratings. Why? Because when I rate an objectively cheesy and dumb movie as good because it has some sort of ideosyncratic value to me, Netflix uses that information to recommend a bunch of terrible movies. And, similarly, when I rate an objectively good movie as bad because it just didn’t quite work, Netflix removes dozens or hundreds of recommendations for things that, in all likelihood, I would enjoy.
Here’s an example. I have been watching Undeclared, Judd Apatow’s TV followup to the ill-fated but excellent Freaks and Geeks. My honest opinion of Undeclared is that it’s just okay. I honestly find listening to the commentary tracks more entertaining than watching the regular shows. But because I like most of Apatow’s other work (Anchorman, 40 Year Old Virgin, etc.), I gave it 4 stars on Netflix, so that it would recommend more Apatow-ish shows/movies to me.
I can’t imagine I’m the only person who tries to anticipate what a recommendation engine will do and aims to game the system to get optimum results.
Obviously, this is relevant for any service that is based on a recommendation engine. I use Amazon’s stars the same way, and there’s lots of other similar stuff going on in other areas.
Bonus content:
Definition of the day: Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary defines “monopsony” as “an oligopsony limited to one buyer.” Tremendously helpful, thank you MW.
Posted in
Creative Commons
March 10th, 2007 at 12:54 am
This reminds me, I really need to add Freaks and Geeks to my Netflix list. Everybody LOVES it.
January 22nd, 2008 at 11:29 am
Buy trahadol online….
Buy trahadol online….