Has anyone else noticed that Bloglines has been utterly off its rocker for the last month or two? It’s repopulating my lists with literally hundreds of posts I’ve already read–often seconds after I read them–and it’s completely stopped updating Slate, not even having the courtesy to hold onto the posts I already marked as “new” to read later. It makes me wonder which other sites’ feeds have stopped working with Bloglines. If anyone at Bloglines has the unfortunate job of searching blogs for mentions of the service, maybe they could forward this complaint to the higher-ups (and make special note of the next paragraph).

I swear, it’s almost enough to make me use an RSS reader on my own computer. Speaking of which, do any of you have a free and robust RSS reader you’d recommend?

 

This is insane. The FBI’s computer and filing systems are literally thirty years old. Their computerized case management system is essentially useless, leaving FBI agents and employees to use paper documents and ancient filing cabinets to keep track of incredibly important investigations. They’ve spent $170 million over the last five years on a catastrophic upgrade plan that would be comical if it didn’t have a chilling impact on the efficiency and capability of the FBI to do its job. The result? An enormous and incredibly expensive bureau-wide system overhaul was implemented poorly based on a set of misguided assumptions, screwed up so badly by a contractor and the FBI itself that the whole kit AND kaboodle were totally scrapped. On the rare occasions that FBI employees aren’t simply doing their work on paper, they’re using command line interfaces via shared workstations that connect through a mainframe. It’s hard to even imagine this. It’s basically like NBC trying to compete with Survivor by airing repeats of Newhart. Except, you know, our national security is at stake and, oh yeah, this is actually happening.

I dunno, maybe this should be a higher priority than banning toothpaste on flights.

 

As part of my unofficial evaluation of our flight security system, I’m off to spend a week in beautiful Denver, Colorado. I’ll be coming through New York City next weekend, and then I’ll be back in Boston.

I will be checking in online, I’m sure, since I’m a giant loser, but probably not that frequently.

 

The general consensus, as far as I can tell, is that the reason the iPod has the portable music/video market dominated is because it’s such a well-made and beautiful device, with seamless iTunes integration. Well let me tell you, there’s PLENTY of room for improvement. Here are my biggest criticisms of the iPod:

  • The clickwheel:
    Guess what, the touch-sensitive wheel you can click to navigate and play/pause/rewind/fast forward… it sorta sucks. Mostly this is a problem of execution, not design–the clickwheel was a revelation when Apple introduced it, but in my everyday user experience it turns out that the iPod’s clickwheel is a bit temperamental. On my old iPod Mini, it only sporadically even detects my finger, leading to a stuttering herky-jerky scrolling where at one second a full rotation doesn’t budge the selection bar and the next second a millimeter finger movement shoots the selection bar down several entries. Even on my new iPod–a month or so old–I’ve been having some trouble with this problem. I don’t know if this speaks to build quality (see below) or design, but it’s an incredibly irritating problem since it can’t be reliably corrected for. Still, in theory a scroll wheel is probably the best way of getting through a long list of items, though. Which leads me to my next complaint:
  • The menu system:
    Now look, it’s fine to navigate by scrolling through lists of songs/albums/artists when you have 150 songs on your adorable little flash player. But at this point my iPod holds something like 55 gigabytes of music. That’s about 10,500 songs. And you’re telling me that if I want to track down a song when I only know the track name, I’ve got to scroll through 10,500 entries to find it? That’s ludicrous. Give me a little virtual keyboard to scroll through so I can search by text string. The Rio Karma I bought 4 years ago managed this trick and I used it all the time. My cell phone does that; why doesn’t my iPod?
  • On-the-go playlists:
    On-the-go playlists aren’t a vital feature, but if you’re gonna have them you might as well do it right. If you want to put together a playlist, there are two ways to go about it:
    1. Figure out what songs you want on the playlist in advance, and use the damnable menu navigation to find the songs and add them to the playlist.
    2. In the course of listening to your music, think “I’d like to add this to my on-the-go playlist” and do it right then, while you’re listening to it.

    Now guess which of these two ideas is supported on the iPod, and which isn’t. If you guessed that the second, intuitive, easy idea works seamlessly, congratulations: you’re as wrong as you’ve ever been. You can’t just hold down the middle button on the clickwheel to add a song to your on-the-go playlist while the song is actually playing. Why? I have no idea. Go ahead, try it right now. See how it doesn’t work? An amazing and bizarre missing feature that would be easy to add.

  • More navigation problems:
    Similarly, there’s no quick way to navigate to the album of the song you’re listening to. Why can’t I just press “menu” and have that as an option?
  • The screen:
    The iPod screen sucks. It’s an energy hog, it’s low-resolution, it’s got a standard aspect ratio in a widescreen world, and it collects scratches like crazy. If there’s one characteristic of the iPod that a new entry to the market could immediately and demonstrably improve upon, it’s this.
  • Build quality:
    Considering how well-made Apple products are supposed to be, I’ve had a lot of problems with mine, ranging from a defective battery to a mysterious and catastrophic hardware failure. Apple is great about fixing or replacing their products when they break, but it sure would be nice to spend my $300 and not have to think about it again for a couple of years.
  • iTunes:
    I won’t say anything about iTunes for the Mac, because a) I’ve never used it; and b) from what I hear, it’s a wonderful program that works quickly and well on OSX. But I have a lot of problems with the Windows XP iteration of the program.
    1. Installation:
      Why must my computer be embossed with quicktime icons and system tray agents every single time I update to the newest version of iTunes? And that’s not even taking into account the occasional music library meltdown that results from approximately one out of every five iTunes updates.
    2. Memory use:
      Simply put, iTunes uses far too much memory. It’s astonishing and absurd. Similarly, every time I close the program my processor load jumps up to 100% for ten or fifteen seconds. Unacceptable. The program is so filled with arcane options and confusing interface choices that it might as well have been put together by Microsoft.
    3. Design:
      iTunes looks and functions more or less as it did five years ago. You’re telling me nobody’s come up with a better interface for a music organization and playing program in five years? Doubtful. (This criticism applies to iPod design as well.)

The sad part, of course, is that the iPod is by far the best player on the market. The problems I listed above are drops in the bucket compared to the significant deficiencies of everything else on the market–abysmal user interfaces, buggy and crash-prone operating systems, proprietary song-transfer programs and/or connection wires, ugly or garish design, etc. But many of these deficiencies are Apple’s fault (not that I blame them for trying to maximize their iPod sales)–they’ve patented the clickwheel, they’ve created a pretty sweet monopoly limiting iTunes Store users to iPods (and limiting iPod users to the iTunes Store*), and they’ve been astonishingly successful at commodifying individuality such that millions of people feel cool and unique for buying the same thing as everyone else.

My point here is not to say that the iPod sucks. My point here is to say that, well, the iPod does sort of suck, and there’s plenty of room in the market for a simple, powerful, intuitive, and affordable competing device. Unfortunately, the first product in Microsoft’s upcoming Zune line doesn’t appear to be that device–it pretty much looks like an ugly imitation of a 3G iPod (circa 2003). Sooner or later, however, somebody’s going to release a device that makes the iPod instantaneously obsolete. Of course that somebody will probably be Apple.

* Buying music through online stores that use file encryption is its own brand of dumb, in my opinion–that’s a whole other post–but it’s clearly here to stay; so the more songs people buy off of iTunes the more dependent they become on iPods.

 

So they caught an enormous plot to blow up planes flying between the US and Britain. That’s really great news. Although the rest of this post is going to be very critical of how we’re going about keeping air travel safe, it is wonderful and quite gratifying that at least some of our security measures are proving effective. The problem is that our identifying and stopping a plot-in-progress somehow leads to everyone suddenly freaking out about our incredible vulnerability. And that’s why we’re cracking down on such dangerous behavior as bringing shampoo or gatorade on planes.

What the new air safety rules will mean: baggage claim is about to get a lot more crowded. I like to carry-on all my stuff, but now I’ll have to check at least some of it–or leave things like shampoo at home. Also, prepare to be at the whim of busy flight attendants, because you can’t bring your own WATER on the plane.

A Boing Boing post on the matter addresses the incredible steps being taken in Britain:

The UK government has responded to this exemplary bit of policing — using investigative techniques to discover plots while they are hatching — by prohibiting all hand-luggage on planes, except for a transparent shopping bag carrying a few permitted items: a couple tampons, baby food (if another passenger is forced to taste it first), glasses without cases (deadly, deadly cases!), contact holders (but no cleaning fluid!), keys (but no electric fobs), and your wallet. You’re not allowed to bring on magazines (deadly, deadly magazines!) or books, no laptops, no iPods, no oversized watches (!), and so forth.

Thankfully things aren’t so crazy on domestic flights within the US (yet?), but the point remains valid: how much liberty are we willing to give up for the sake of an amorphous idea of security?

It’s easy to say that it’s worth giving up access to our throwing stars while on flights (not that we have to…) for the sake of preventing terrorist attacks, but what about forcing anyone who wants to bring a liquid on a plane to check his or her bags for the sake of making everyone feel better that a plot that’s already been stopped will continue not to happen? Or, to take it back a few years, what about disallowing people to bring nail clippers and bic lighters on planes (lighters aren’t even allowed in checked luggage!) for the sake of accomplishing… um, nothing really? Now look, I’m not arguing that it’s an incredible hardship for me to leave things at home and buy them at my destination. But the idea that my carrying a 1.5″ swiss army knife is in some way dangerous is ludicrous, and the people making decisions about what’s safe and what’s not are well aware of that. They don’t forbid utility blades because the tiny little knives are dangerous; they forbid them because it makes it look like they’re doing something. When a guy tried to use a shoe bomb they started making us take off our own shoes, and now that these guys (presumably) tried to use some kind of combustible liquid they’re going to stop letting us bring juice on to planes. (And what will they do the first time they run out of water and somebody passes out?)

Air travel carries a high risk of terrorism, I know, and surely some degree of security is necessary and desireable. But I am getting sick of living in a country that’s rapidly becoming a caricature of a police state. Constant blaring announcements urging us to be suspicious of fellow passengers and report any “suspicious behavior.” Concrete barriers in front of every building. Endless lines for ineffective metal detectors manned by indifferent agents who make less money than gas station attendants–at the airport, yes, but in every government building as well. Think of the time and money and personal attention “national security” costs us every day–both from the professionals who conduct it and from the millions of innocent people who are inconvenienced and not really protected by it.

This attitude–the idea that it’s more important to look like we’re addressing a problem than to actually address it–drives me crazy. Seeing these security measures everywhere doesn’t make me feel safer, it makes me feel irritated that I have to spend so much of every day going through the motions in order to mollify the general population. I’m sure they didn’t catch these guys in Britain because one of them was trying to sneak baby formula onto a plane–they caught him through the standard channels of surveillance and investigation that are both more effective and less obtrusive than these constant checkpoints and useless regulations. There are tons of things going on behind the scenes to which we in the public aren’t privy, and although those mostly-secret actions have their own issues at least they aren’t essentially public relation moves.

So, in summary, prepare to wait for half an hour for three ounces of water whenever you’re thirsty on a plane, because they successfully stopped a terrorist plot. If they manage to stop another one we’ll probably have to pass a blood test before being allowed to fly. Your tax dollars at work!

A couple links you might find enlightening:

 

Is it possible that the Shout Out Louds, the Yeah Yeah Yeahs, and Clap Your Hands Say Yeah! are actually just 4 or 5 hipster kids screwing around? I mean, did they just put random optimistic words and phrases on a few dice and roll until they came up with this band name selection?

And here are a couple of home made videos by another band that seems to have taken its name from the same bingo ball holder as all of the above, OK Go:

This video, for “A Million Ways,” made the internet rounds a while ago but man, it is really great. What’s awesome about it is that although it’s hilariously-amateurish the guys are not kidding around here. They’re really doing their best with a complicated and clever choreography. It’s really an impressive, if ridiculous, video. Five out of five stars.

Here’s a newer video, for “Here It Goes Again,” a song that’s not quite as good. It’s is more or less the same idea as the video for “A Million Ways,” but with treadmills. Again, I’ve got to hand it to these guys for their utter commitment to the choreography. Very cool and clever–like the clichéd Native Americans, they use all parts of the treadmill. Four out of five stars.

OK Go’s album, “Oh No,” is very good. I recommend that you give it a listen if you haven’t already done so.

Thanks to Molly for posting “Here It Goes Again”!

 

There is no excuse, nor should there be any tolerance, for anyone who thinks or expresses any kind of Anti-Semitic remark. I want to apologize specifically to everyone in the Jewish community for the vitriolic and harmful words that I said to a law enforcement officer the night I was arrested on a DUI charge.

I am a public person, and when I say something, either articulated and thought out, or blurted out in a moment of insanity, my words carry weight in the public arena. As a result, I must assume personal responsibility for my words and apologize directly to those who have been hurt and offended by those words.

The tenets of what I profess to believe necessitate that I exercise charity and tolerance as a way of life. Every human being is God’s child, and if I wish to honor my God I have to honor his children. But please know from my heart that I am not an anti-Semite. I am not a bigot. Hatred of any kind goes against my faith.

I’m not just asking for forgiveness. I would like to take it one step further, and meet with leaders in the Jewish community, with whom I can have a one on one discussion to discern the appropriate path for healing.

I have begun an ongoing program of recovery and what I am now realizing is that I cannot do it alone. I am in the process of understanding where those vicious words came from during that drunken display, and I am asking the Jewish community, whom I have personally offended, to help me on my journey through recovery. Again, I am reaching out to the Jewish community for its help. I know there will be many in that community who will want nothing to do with me, and that would be understandable. But I pray that that door is not forever closed.

This is not about a film. Nor is it about artistic license. This is about real life and recognizing the consequences hurtful words can have. It’s about existing in harmony in a world that seems to have gone mad.

Say what you will about the man; that is a good apology. Of course a cynic would argue that it’s really just an impressive bit of damage control, but I would never say anything like that.

[MollyGood]

 

Old posts:

There are two lessons I draw from these posts:

  1. I can see the future.

    I accurately described Tom Cruise’s farcical marriage (including the sham baby!) and anticipated Mel Gibson’s going around the bend.*

  2. Who cares?

    These aren’t world leaders or great philosophers; they’re purveyors of generally mindless entertainment. As much as I enjoy making the case that they are somehow coercing their fans into sharing their awful beliefs, I don’t think I can seriously argue it. Do you think anybody has become a scientologist because of Tom Cruise’s meltdown? Is there anybody walking around today saying, “you know, Mel’s right–Jews ARE responsible for the world’s suffering!”?

    There will always be people who think these things, and at least a few of those people will be famous. But does it really make any difference in my life if Tom Cruise is a raving lunatic, or if Mel Gibson drinks too much and reveals his (completely unsurprising) bigotry? I don’t think it does. And does it somehow change the value of their work? I don’t think so, at least in the sense that I think an artistic work (yes, I am including The Patriot and Cocktail in the category) should be judged on its own merits, and not by the context of its creation.

All that being said, though, I find it doubtful that I will ever watch a Tom Cruise/Mel Gibson movie without being distracted by thoughts of their respective derangements. I know that as soon as The Passion of the Christ came out, Gibson’s filmography took on a different shape. Suddenly I noticed that almost every role he played required him to get beaten, abused, or tortured–and often sacrifice himself for a greater good. And of course Tom Cruise’s manic grin and desperate affability look different in the cold light of morning, as well.

I like to read and write about the personal lives of famous people, and I do think there’s an element of relevance in some of these stories. Fame carries with it influence, and a celebrity’s views on significant matters like race, religion, sexual orientation, global poverty, etc. can actually make a real difference in the world. For example, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to argue that The Passion of the Christ acted as a real, if minor, energizing force in the evangelical Christian movement. But there’s a huge difference between the effect of releasing that movie and the effect of making some boorish and offensive remarks after getting pulled over for drunk driving. I don’t like Mel for saying the things he said, but I think it’s somewhat hilarious that there are people out there condemning him for them after giving him a pass when he released his polemic two years ago.

In summary: Mel Gibson is a hateful jerk**, which we pretty much already knew. Tom Cruise has constructed an elaborate but clumsy public life to mask what is surely a pathetic and weird private life. Making sweeping judgments about either man because of how he chooses to live his life is both unfair and inevitable.

* Yeah, I know. Not exactly the most difficult prognostication ever performed.

** Isn’t it interesting how Mel’s getting excoriated for his entirely predictable anti-semitic rant while getting a free pass on calling a female officer “sugar-tits” and attempting to threaten his way out of the arrest by claiming to own Malibu? Do you still want to see this guy as the lead in What Women Want?

© 2011 Hello World Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha