Watch what happens when an enormous meteor slams into the Earth in this uplifting video:

Check out this site for a translation of what’s going on.

The earth’s crust of 10km in thickness where ground in the earth is composed is wholly peeled off. This is called,”Earth’s crust tidal wave”. There is 1km width of the rock, and it flies to the sky it by the impact. The impact surges to the Japanese Islands and,as a result, the Japanese Islands are crushed. The splinter of the crushed rock easily exceeds the height of 1000Km. After exceeding the atmosphere it reaches space. Afterwards, the splinter of the rock falls again in surface of the earth. The edge of Crater completed by the collision of the meteorite is 7000m in height. It looks like a huge mountain range. The diameter of Crater has 4000Km. Crater is big to swallow a part from Guam to a Chinese continent. But,it was only an introductory chapter of the tragedy that would start in the future…

[BoingBoing]

 

When my iPod broke a few days ago, I went to the Apple store to get it replaced. While I was there, I checked out the hardware, and I gotta say–I don’t want any of it.

Let’s back up a little bit. First of all, I’ve used Windows/DOS PCs for essentially my entire computing life. I spent one summer working on a Mac (a year or two before OSX) and enjoyed it, for the most part, but up til now it’s safe to say that I’ve never been any more than an excellent candidate for Apple’s “Switch” campaign. But that’s just it, I really am an excellent candidate. I’m not a gamer, and I’m not committed to any Windows-only software. I use my computer to watch movies, listen to music, observe the internet, and write stuff.

Now, there’s no real reason why I can’t do all of these things just as well on a Mac, and generally speaking it seems probable that at least some of those tasks would work better. Some extremely interesting developments in the last year or so have made Macs a lot more appealing to me: 1) They switched to Intel processors, opening the door to better performance and to: 2) They made it easy to install Windows on a Mac, and 3) They seem to have decided to make music and video playing a major selling point for their hardware (introducing video playing on the iPod, a short-term solution that’ll be permanently solved by the inevitable videoPod or whatever they decide to call the widescreen pocket video player they release in the next year; bundling a remote with every computer they sell; getting ready to start vending movies through iTunes). OSX is extremely interesting to me, and seems like a great combination of a powerful, versatile, and stable infrastructure with a simple and intuitive user interface on top of it. Especially now that it’s effectively compatible with Windows, it’s easy to see the upside of switching from Microsoft’s platform to Apple’s.

So anyway, at some point I’m going to give an Apple computer a shot. But, even if I could afford it right now, there’d be no chance of my buying any of Apple’s current line. Why?

  • Expertise.
    Windows has a number of major weaknesses–it’s vulnerable to viruses; it’s prone to memory leaks; the OS and a lot of the software written for the OS are bloated and slow and filled with unnecessary functionality; the surfeit of hardware meant to be compatible with Windows means that installing almost any new device is an exercise in frustration; the system inexplicably crashes, relatively speaking, all the time–but I am extremely familiar with those weaknesses and, for the most part, know how to fix them when they come up. This is an idiotic reason not to switch–it boils down to, “I know how to deal with the myriad deficiencies of my Model-T, so I’m going to pass on that Civic”–but it’s a very real emotional hurdle that anyone who’s worked with Windows for their entire adulthood finds difficult to clear.
  • Choice
    If I want a Mac, I have very few options. Both in terms of the actual computer (two types of laptop, two or three types of desktop… enjoy the variety!) and the options offered with those computers (want a different video card with your Mac Mini? Too bad). Now, it’s plausible that, thanks to the switch to Intel-based hardware, sometime soon I’ll be able to swap the internals relatively easily. But if you think Apple is likely to increase your choice of computer (either by introducing a bunch of new computer models or licensing its OS to anyone else), you’ve got to see this sweet bridge I’m selling in New York.
  • Individuality
    Look, there was a time when buying a Mac meant you were smart and creative and cool. But that time is long gone. If there’s any doubt about how Apple feels about expressing your personality through your devices, consider the fact that their introduction of black iPods and MacBooks doubled the color options for those products (to two, for those of you who haven’t been counting). At this point, Apple has become a purveyor of the same kind of individuality as Urban Outfitters. In other words, thoughtless conformity with a phony uniqueness that really identifies you as, not just part of the crowd but deluded about it as well. I hate the commoditization of individuality (see also: the Gap, MTV, MySpace), and Apple is about as good at convincing its customers that they are expressing themselves as any multi-national syndicate.

    Of course, being a true individual means looking past how a purchase will make you look and actually considering what the best product for you is, but still–I’d much rather be one of millions of contented Dell owners than one of millions of Mac owners, each of whom believes he or she is a delicate flower.

  • Stubbornness
    Apple has quietly supported two-button pointing for a long time, but they refuse to institutionally admit the obvious superiority of the feature by including it in their own laptops. That’s right, their lovely trackpads are crippled by their single button. They finally buckled with the Mighty Mouse, but I tried it out and the purported multi-button functionality is awkward and weird. Just include two buttons, Apple!

    I mention all of this not because the single button mouse is keeping me from switching, but rather because this is symptomatic of a serious problem Apple has–they have a “my way or the highway” attitude that trickles all the way down from Steve Jobs to, I imagine, the lucky janitor who had to sign a 20 page Do Not Disclose agreement before he could start cleaning up after Apple’s insular computer engineers. Don’t get me wrong, lots of companies act like this. But before I buy into Apple’s hardware monopoly I want to be sure that they’re actually looking to improve their products in ways that benefit me.

  • Products
    Okay, let’s get specific about Apple’s current offerings:
    • MacBook:
      Man, I thought I would love this machine. I mean, if I needed a laptop right now I would have probably already ordered the MacBook. But it’s worthless! It’s way too heavy, and the screen is a disastrous size–too small for serious computing, and too big for true portability. It tries to straddle the divide between portability and usability, but ultimately I think it fails on both counts. The worst part about this is that Apple replaced the 12″ iBook and PowerBook with the MacBook, meaning they don’t offer a single truly portable laptop anymore. Huge mistake, unless they’re quietly paving the way for a new ultraportable (not out of the realm of possibility). I did like the keyboard, though–it’s built like an old-school calculator, with buttons rather than keys. I can see how it might rub people the wrong way, but I suspect once you get used to it it’s fun to use.
    • MacBook Pro:
      Good looking device, no question, and specs-wise I’m sure it’s up to any computing I might want to do. But it’s massive, especially the seventeen inch model. I guess I just don’t understand why people buy these huge desktop-replacement laptops. Isn’t the whole point of these things that you can bring them with you everywhere? If you want a sweet computer to sit under your desk but still be able to access your documents elsewhere, save yourself a thousand bucks and get a desktop model and a thumbdrive to save your documents on. And if portable computing is that important to you, you’d probably be better off with an actually portable computer. Am I crazy here? All I know is that I love my 12″ screen, 4.1 pound laptop and would be extremely reluctant to “upgrade” to anything bigger or heavier.
    • Mac Mini:
      This one’s tempting, but it’s a little too expensive and way too limited in terms of expansion. Still, I suspect that once Apple makes some strategic adjustments, this will be the model everyone buys as the centerpiece to their entertainment centers, and I can certainly imagine myself doing the same thing someday. Emphasis on someday.
    • iMac:
      When I have to recycle my computer, I don’t want to have to toss out a beautiful seventeen inch widescreen LCD at the same time.

Still, sooner or later Apple is going to release a compact Intel-based computer that runs or emulates Windows. It’ll be optimized for the things I need (media storage/playing, seamless networking, lookin’ good). And that computer will let me right click. And, price-wise, it’ll compare favorably with anything else on the market. And I’ll buy it.

But that hasn’t happened yet. And I’m not holding my breath, either.

Also, in other wonderful news, Futurama (the show behind my iPod’s inscription and this very blog’s mantra) is coming back to television! In two damn years, but still, that’s pretty awesome. And you know the writers have a lot of ideas that they thought of as soon as the show got cancelled, so expect excellence and hilarity! Of course, there’s a dark side to this news–my once-authoritative Futurama DVD collection is officially incomplete. Sad face. I wonder how this news affects the theoretically-upcoming Futurama movie(s). (Thanks for the link, thebestmarkever!)

 
  • Landon Donovan: Wildly overrated. Can barely dribble the ball without falling down or losing it (or both).
  • Eddie Pope: Should have known better than to get that red card against Italy. It was a bad call but he shouldn’t have given the ref the opportunity to make it.
  • Kasey Keller: I dunno. He looked okay to me (although I missed the Czech slaughter, so maybe that’s not accurate). Time for him to sign with RED BULL NEW YORK and enjoy a life of leisure.
  • Oguchi Onyewu: Out of control, inept, terrible. Deserved or not, the guy:yellow cards::philatelists:stamps. I swear, somebody’s gotta explain to the man that he’s not supposed to just drag people to the ground with awkward rugby tackles.
  • Brian McBride: Gutsy, creaky. If he wants to, he can spend the next year parleying his manly performance into unlimited, um, romance.
  • DaMarcus Beasley: Mediocre, invisible most of the time. But he played a terrific ball for the US offense’s only goal of the World Cup.
  • Claudio Reyna: A disappointing mistake sullies an otherwise decent career. To be honest, though, Reyna has never been any more than a reliable and boring midfielder. The way that he gave Ghana their first goal demonstrates why this should be his final cap.
  • Clinton Dempsey: Hey look guys, sombody on the team actually likes shooting balls at the goal. Imagine if somebody else had tried that!

Looking good on paper doesn’t get you into the second round of the World Cup, nor should it. The US need not be ashamed of its effort or its results this year, but they should use the disappointing tournament experience as motivation to improve its myriad weaknesses (playing balls to space, defending without fouling, upping game tempo to take advantage of superiority in conditioning, etc.) in 4 years.

And Arena, who advanced the US team’s prospects enormously four years ago, should no longer be the head coach next week.

As for the whining about the officiating: The refs screwed the US this year, but maybe if we had tried actually playing decently things would have gone our way. The draw against Italy was inspirational, but today against Ghana we looked as sluggish and unambitious as the final score indicates. (I think the Dallas Mavericks need to learn the same lesson: great teams make their own luck.)

I will say this, however: I love the fact that the American team doesn’t spend half of the game writhing on the ground in a craven attempt to garner free kicks and red cards. The fact that such odious antics are effective is FIFA’s cross to bear, not ours.

Overall, I think the team got what it deserved, from getting destroyed by the other eventual Group E losers to exposing the Italians as a bunch of smelly cheap shot artists to wilting under Ghana’s relatively weak attack. We weren’t gonna win it all this year, so maybe we’ll be able to use this experience to give us a chance next time.

Meanwhile, I’ll be rooting for Switzerland but I expect Argentina to continue steamrolling everyone they play. Brazil is the only team with a reasonable chance of beating Argentina, and that’s if they (Brazil) stop screwing around and actually bother to focus.

 
  1. I went to Fenway on Monday night to watch the Nationals commence part two of their anti-Yankees strategy. They did a great job. Fenway is, in fact, a beautiful stadium and I had a great time despite the extremely drunk moron who sat next to me and screamed horrible things directly into the ears of several toddlers. Fenway Franks are pretty good. If you sit in right field, you’ll probably want to bring some sunglasses for the first couple of innings.
  2. My iPod died yesterday, and today I went to the Apple store and they replaced it, no questions asked. I am excited about my opportunity to not allow the screen to get terribly scratched up this time. The bad news: 1) I had to pay $30 because it was more than 6 months into the warranty; 2) I had to choose between waiting 2 weeks for them to re-inscribe it or taking my replacement without one, so it’s goodbye to my incredibly witty inscription.
  3. I won tickets to an early screening of Superman on Monday, so you can expect a half-assed crappy review sometime thereafter.

Those were the Things You Should Know. I hope you enjoyed them.

 

It appears that the Washington Post did a little redesign of the bottom half of their front page. Basically, what they did was uglify things and strew some ads around willy-nilly (“some ads” is really doing the situation a disservice, though–the ads are multitudinous and garish in the extreme). Also, at least on my computer, it seems like it’s getting stuck on loading right after the “Markets” section, so a bunch of content just isn’t showing up for a literal minute or two; this is, obviously, an internet eternity. Overall, the “designers” managed to obfuscate, deface, and disfigure what had been a fairly homely but functional website. Great job guys, cigars all around.

They also changed the font, I think. That part looks fine.

 

This isn’t very timely, but so be it.

I watched Match Point last night. It was pretty good, but I liked it better when it was called The Talented Mr. Ripley. Okay, it wasn’t exactly the same, but it had some definite similarities (which I won’t go into because they’re essential to the two plots). Anyway, this movie had a little buzz when it came out last year, mostly because it turned out that Woody Allen managed to actually make a movie that wasn’t a Woody Allen movie. Meaning it wasn’t (completely) filled with cloying neuroses and whiny dialogue, and the usual Allen players were MIA*. Also, the camera moved around and there were some artful moments.

A couple of departures from Allen’s standard made a huge difference: the setting is London, not Manhattan; and the superb soundtrack is opera, not jazz. It’s like Woody suddenly realized that he didn’t have to go through the motions and conventions that anchored just about all of his artistic endeavors up to this point. There were hints of this in Melinda and Melinda, which had a lot of Allen’s typical ideosyncrasies but exhibited bursts of actual creativity. Though ultimately it wasn’t a great movie, it was at least a novel disappointment.

The acting was very good, and the writing was solid, and the movie looked terrific. Although I certainly haven’t seen all of Allen’s movies, this was by a wide margin the most filmic–meaning polished, plotted, and professional–of those I have. Add an engaging (if somewhat slow-moving) plot and enough twists to keep the viewer guessing to the end, and Match Point is by a wide margin Allen’s best effort in years.

* Although it’s clear that Scarlett Johansson, who’s also in Allen’s upcoming Scoop (also set in London, interestingly–can we expect the next two decades of Allen films to be about Brits and ex-pats?), is the director’s new muse–even though, if you ask me, she was the weakest actor in Match Point. But yeah, definitely the most attractive.

 

Google is building what looks to be the foundation for Skynet, in a place called “The Dalles” in Oregon (keep an eye out in the full article for the woman who compares Google with Lord Voldemort):

On the banks of the windswept Columbia River, Google is working on a secret weapon in its quest to dominate the next generation of Internet computing. But it is hard to keep a secret when it is a computing center as big as two football fields, with twin cooling plants protruding four stories into the sky.

. . .

Even before the Oregon center comes online, Google has lashed together a global network of computers — known in the industry as the Googleplex — that is a singular achievement. “Google has constructed the biggest computer in the world, and it’s a hidden asset,” said Danny Hillis, a supercomputing pioneer and a founder of Applied Minds, a technology consulting firm, referring to the Googleplex.

But, uh, not to worry. Remember, Google’s motto is “Don’t be Evil,” So I’m sure we’ll all be fine.

Just in case, though, let me get this out of the way early so it’s cached come the Revolution: I submit wholly to the will of our benevolent overlords. All praise the mighty Pagerank.

 

What do you do when you need to install an A/C unit but your windows open side-to-side instead of up-and-down? Well, you do your best to jury-rig a solution:

Looks pretty good, right? Well, yeah, right up until you raise the windowshade:

If you’re interested, here’s a close-up view. Just call me MacGuyver.

Also, here’s a picture I took of a goose under the Charles Gate bridge.

© 2011 Hello World Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha