Don’t watch this video at work, but do watch it. It’s pretty… hilarious? Awful? Disgusting?
I could try to describe this photo set for you, but it would involve words like “drunk pig” and “cannon” and I think it’s best to just let you experience it for yourself.
Not only does MC Hammer have a blog, the man has a philosophy.
Warning: apparently there is some sound on the site.
Great moments in journalism:
Man’s shirt erupts in flames after he is shot with Taser
DAYTONA BEACH — Dennis Crouch had already slashed himself. And when he refused to drop his knife, Daytona Beach police Officer Betsy Cassidy decided she had no choice.“Taser! Taser!” Cassidy shouted as she sent a two-pronged wire, packing 50,000 volts, at Crouch’s chest. What happened next stunned everyone.
A Taser probe pierced the pocket of his khaki shirt — and ignited the butane lighter inside. Crouch’s pocket exploded in flames.
“The subject,” recounted Sgt. Al Tolley in a subsequent report, “immediately dropped the knife.”
Uh, yeah. I bet he did.
For any of you who might be looking into the profession, I’d encourage you to frame a copy of this piece and hang it on your wall. It’s pretty much the perfect story.
The rest of the South Florida Sun-Sentinal article is here.
Free wireless mouse/keyboard from Lenovo (IBM). I don’t know why it is free but it is (I just got my order confirmation email for $0.00). Jump on it, before they wise up–and make sure to click on the “don’t email me about anything else, ever” box.
Update: looks like the offer’s gone now.
George Will wonders why conservatives are happier than liberals and predictably comes up with reasons that conservatism causes happiness.
Well, George, you’ve got to understand the correlative fallacy here. Maybe it’s not that being conservative makes one happy but rather that being happy (read: complacent) makes one interested in preserving the status quo and keeping one’s own circumstances as wonderful as possible (at the expense of the people whose own circumstances may not make them so happy).
I’m not saying that’s true, I’m just saying that, you know, let’s not jump to self-congragulatory conclusions just yet.
My favorite part is definitely this impressive bit of compressed contradiction:
Such puzzles show why social science is not for amateurs. Still, one cannot — yet — be prosecuted for committing theory without a license, so consider a few explanations of the happiness gap.
Also, going hunting is not for amateurs. Still, one cannot — yet — be prosecuted for hunting without a license. Apparently.
Oh, man.
There are those who are choosing to spend their retirements on cruise ships rather than in retirement homes. What started out as a rampant internet urban legend has apparently become the truth, as the price of permanent cruise ship living is comparable to, if not lower than, that of retirement communities.
Here’s the internet source, which is itself adapted from an earlier “it’s cheaper to live at a Holiday Inn than in a retirement home” meme:
About 2 years ago my wife and I were on a cruise through the western Mediterranean aboard a Princess liner. At dinner we noticed an elderly lady sitting alone along the rail of the grand stairway in the main dining room.I also noticed that all the staff, ships officers, waiters, busboys, etc., all seemed very familiar with this lady. I asked our waiter who the lady was, expecting to be told she owned the line, but he said he only knew that she had been on board for the last four cruises, back to back.
As we left the dining room one evening I caught her eye and stopped to say hello. We chatted and I said, “I understand you’ve been on this ship for the last four cruises.” She replied, “Yes, that’ s true.” I stated, “I don’t understand” and she replied, without a pause, “It’s cheaper than a nursing home.”
So, there will be no nursing home in my future. When I get old and feeble, I am going to get on a Princess Cruise Ship. The average cost for a nursing home is $200 per day. I have checked on reservations at Princess and I can get a long term discount and senior discount price of $135 per day. That leaves $65 a day for:
1. Gratuities which will only be $10 per day.
2. I will have as many as 10 meals a day (of fantastic food, not institutional food) if I can waddle to the restaurant, or I can have room service (which means I can have breakfast in bed every day of the week).
3. Princess has as many as three swimming pools, a workout room, free washers and dryers, and shows every night.
4. They have free toothpaste and razors, and free soap and shampoo.
5. They will even treat you like a customer, not a patient. An extra $5 worth of tips will have the entire staff scrambling to help you.
6. I will get to meet new people every 7 or 14 days!
7. TV broken? Light bulb need changing? Need to have the mattress replaced? No problem! They will fix everything and apologize for your inconvenience.
8. Clean sheets and towels every day, and you don’t even have to ask for them.
9. If you fall in the nursing home and break a hip you are on Medicare; if you fall and break a hip on the Princess ship they will upgrade you to a suite for the rest of your life.
10. There is always a doctor on board.
Now hold on for the best! Do you want to see South America, the Panama Canal, Tahiti, Australia, New Zealand, Asia, or name where you want to go? Princess will have a ship ready to go. So don’t look for me in a nursing home, just call shore to ship.
PS: And don’t forget, when you die, they just dump you over the side at no charge.
It’s obviously tongue-in-cheek, but really–there are some good points here. The service on cruise ships is notoriously excellent, the food is spectacular, you get the chance to do a ton of travelling to foreign ports (albeit ones corrupted by American tourism dollars), and you are exposed to a steady stream of fresh faces. With costs more or less equal, who wouldn’t at least consider choosing a perpetual caribbean cruise over a sterile and lonely nursing home?
As the article points out, there are some serious non-economic concerns with the lifestyle–cramped accomodations, superficial friendships, loss of contact with family–and I’m sure there are plenty of other good reasons why it’s best to leave this idea alone. But I can definitely see it as an appealing option for a retired widow/widower (or an old married couple) in decent health. If not as a permanent arrangement, at least for a year or two of all-you-can-eat decadence at sea.
[link from kottke]
I used a Mach III razor for a long time, but had a lot of problems with it. The blades were expensive. I never figure out a good time in my morning routine for shaving–if I shaved before showering I would hurt myself and not get a close shave; if I shaved during my shower I’d miss spots and have to clean them up afterward or walk around with stray spiderlegs; if I shaved after my shower I’d have to deal with the fogged-up mirror, and with getting shaving cream all over my face and having to wash it all over again (and getting shaving cream water all over the bathroom). And I cut or irritated my skin most of the time, anyway.
So about a year ago I decided to switch to an electric razor. I sprung for a pretty good one, and in a lot of ways it is an enormous improvement: I don’t need shaving cream. I don’t need to buy new overpriced blades. I don’t have to worry about cutting myself. But there is one problem–I simply can’t get a close shave. I think I am getting as close a shave as I possibly can, with an electric razor, but it’s just not satisfactory. I don’t like having five-o’clock-shadow as my baseline shave.
So I’ve got to admit that as hilarious and absurd as the new Gillette Fusion may be (“um, our competitors one-upped us with a four blade razor… so check out our five blade razor!”), I’m seriously considering switching back. Have any of you guys tried out the Fusion? How does it compare to the Mach III? Can my sensitive skin handle it? Should I just stick with my electric, which unquestionably does an adequate job?
(Here’s a review of the Fusion.)
Follow me on Twitter