1. The package looked pretty boring, but I sensed that it contained an item of great power.

2. Hey, look at that! It’s an iPod!

3. Apple’s packaging is always pretty sleek.

4. You can’t really tell from this pic, but the screen is pretty nice.

5. I basically bought this thing just so I could get this inscription.

6. It’s thin but feels sturdy.

7. Sorry I didn’t take off the plastic wrap, but I’m trying to prevent scratches until at least tomorrow.

You can see the slideshow version of these pics, plus one extra, in the Director’s Cut.

 

Reason Magazine has a pretty fascinating discussion of what a company’s responsibilities are in terms of charitable giving. The discussion comprises very interesting treatises by Milton Friedman, the Nobel laureate for economics who thirty-five years ago wrote an article titled “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits”; Whole Foods’ CEO and founder, John Mackey; and Cypress Semiconductor’s CEO and founder, T.J. Rodgers. It’s not short, but I found it fascinating to see the different ways in which these guys see the role of public companies–economically, socially, and morally. Things get sort of heated by the end of the exchange.

I have selected what I’d consider to be a characteristic passage for each man (although you should really read the whole thing–don’t be so lazy):

Mackey:

I’m a businessman and a free market libertarian, but I believe that the enlightened corporation should try to create value for all of its constituencies. From an investor’s perspective, the purpose of the business is to maximize profits. But that’s not the purpose for other stakeholders—for customers, employees, suppliers, and the community. Each of those groups will define the purpose of the business in terms of its own needs and desires, and each perspective is valid and legitimate.

Friedman:

Whole Foods Market’s contribution to society—and as a customer I can testify that it is an important one—is to enhance the pleasure of shopping for food. Whole Foods has no special competence in deciding how charity should be distributed. Any funds devoted to the latter would surely have contributed more to society if they had been devoted to improving still further the former.

Rodgers:

John Mackey’s article attacking corporate profit maximization could not have been written by “a free market libertarian,” as claimed. Indeed, if the examples he cites had not identified him as the author, one could easily assume the piece was written by Ralph Nader. A more accurate title for his article is “How Business and Profit Making Fit Into My Overarching Philosophy of Altruism.”

Mackey spouts nonsense about how his company hired his original investors, not vice versa. If Whole Foods ever falls on persistent hard times—perhaps when the Luddites are no longer able to hold back the genetic food revolution using junk science and fear—he will quickly find out who has hired whom, as his investors fire him.

With the caveat that I’m basically ignorant and stupid about the subject, I believe in free market economics. I think that all three of the men involved in the roundtable do, too, but they certainly diverge in their interpretation of what that means. For what it’s worth, I believe that Friedman is right, but I think that Mackey is doing what I would do if I were in his position. Oh, and Rodgers scares me.

Oct 252005
 

This nerdy tattoo is really great. I’m not going to explain it to you (the explanation can be found here), but I will say that it holds a special place in my heart.

And I’m proud to say that I figured out what it meant without reading the explanation.

His second tattoo is extraordinarily nerdy, too. But romantic.

[from A Welsh View]

 

West Wing is really getting pretty good again. Now that they’ve more or less given up on the cheap melodrama (car bombs, heart attacks, kidnappings) and gotten back to policy arguments and partisan bickering, the show is starting to resemble the program that I found so interesting 5 years ago. Wow, 5 years ago. Anyway, I’m impressed with most of the developments of the last few episodes, with the caveat that I think the writers are trying too hard to emulate the cadence and tone of Aaron Sorkin’s old scripts. His dialogue is one of a kind, and imitating it just ends up hollow and awkward.

The leak plot is coming to a head just as a real life leak investigation does the same (although the justification for the real life leak is quite a bit more sinister than the reason behind Toby’s behavior); the campaign stuff is interesting (and of course is very important, since it tells us who we’ll be watching for the next 3 or 4 years (unless the show gets cancelled, which it probably will)); I just figured out that Santos’s wife is played by the estimable Teri Polo, whom some of us remember fondly as Rebecca from Sorkin’s short-lived masterpiece, Sports Night; Janeane Garofolo is doing a very good job as Josh’s latest shrew/possible love interest (Mandy, Amy, Joey Lucas).

I am excited about the live debate coming up in a couple of weeks, as gimmicky as it may be. And I am very much looking forward to the inevitable return of Donna Moss, who for some reason just refuses to reply to my love letters. And now that he lost his own show, might we be treated to the return of the Boy King, Sam Seaborn? I’m just saying, it’s not like Rob Lowe’s got a lot on his plate these days.

So that’s what I think–West Wing is definitely watchable once more.

As long as we’re talking about my television obsessions, I might as well just include this Boondocks comic, which really hit home for me.

The OC and Arrested Development (and Reunion, for that matter) should return to prime time next week, once baseball stops happening. Huzzah.

 

Time magazine recently released a list of the best 100 novels from 1923 to today. Matthew Baldwin of the Morning News went to Amazon.com and selected some 1-star reviews of those books. Here’s a sampling:

Mrs. Dalloway (1925)

Author: Virginia Woolf

“The only good thing to say about this “literary” drivel is that the person responsible, Virginia Woolf, has been dead for quite some time now. Let us pray to God she stays that way.”

Lolita (1955)

Author: Vladimir Nabokov

“1) I’m bored. 2) He uses too many allusions to other novels, so that if you’re not well read, this book makes no sense. 3) Most American readers are not fluent in French, so to have conversations or interjections in French with no translation is plain dumb. 4) Did I mention I was bored? 5) As with another reviewer, I agree, he uses a lot of huge words that just slow a person down. And it’s not for theatrics either, it’s just huge words mid-sentence when describing something simple. Nothing in the sense of imagery is gained. 6) Also, to sum it up, it’s a story about a pedophile.”

The Sound and the Fury (1929)

Author: William Faulkner

“This book is like an ungrateful girlfriend. You do your best to understand her and get nothing back in return.”

 

An Oklahoma man pled guilty to shooting with intent to kill and robbery. The plea carried a penalty of 30 years’ imprisonment.

But Eric James Torpy wanted his prison term to match Bird’s jersey number 33.

“He said if he was going to go down, he was going to go down in Larry Bird’s jersey,” Oklahoma County District Judge Ray Elliott said Wednesday. “We accommodated his request and he was just as happy as he could be.

 

Well, to no one’s surprise, Manhattan is the most expensive city in the US. But it’s WAY more expensive–24%more–than the 2nd place city, San Francisco. More interesting to me is that, until this year, I’ve lived exclusively in or in the area of 4 of the top 5 (and San Jose is pretty close to San Francisco, so I think I’ve got an argument for a clean sweep of expensiveness). This is probably why I get so angry when I hear friends talking about their $400/month rent being a huge ripoff.

I know that wages generally scale based on cost-of-living, but for students and out-of-town visitors this stuff makes a huge difference. Speaking of which, I’m going to be in New York City this weekend. I look forward to frittering away lots of money on $10 drinks and cross-town cabs.

 

That’s right, this blog is the 48th link to come up when you google “wifebeater ryan o.c.“. And the 9th link for “o.c. sandy mullet“.

© 2011 Hello World Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha