In Which I Fawn Over Kanye West

Date December 1, 2008

I’ve written about Kanye West before, generally positively. Recently I have been listening to his new album, 808s & Heartbreak (my thoughts below), and in looking for some reviews online I happened upon this one by Ann Powers in the LA Times music blog:

“Grace appears most purely in that human form which either has no consciousness or an infinite consciousness. That is, in the puppet or in the god,” wrote the German poet and philosopher Heinrich von Kleist in 1810. Watching the dance of a beautiful marionette, which has no sense of self, we begin to ponder our own self-awareness—the very essence of humanity. West seeks a similar effect on “808s and Heartbreak,” a heavy trip indeed.

Unlike many of the commenters chiming in on that site, I think this review is pretty damn good. Kanye seems to be getting a lot of respect from reviewers, which is interesting—much of his music up til now has seemed calculated and shallow (not generally good qualities with respect to critical acclaim), but I have always thought it exhibited a self-awareness that belied its superficiality. He’s been successful in the mainstream because he’s a great producer and an adequate rapper—he can put together an incredibly catchy hook as well as anybody out there—but he’s always been more than an adept musician. For a while, it seemed like he was very good at catching trends early and riding the wave—see his embrace of 80s kitsch right before, e.g., Grand Theft Auto: Vice City came out, and his use of futuristic imagery and sound on his last album. But it seems to me now that he has actually done quite a bit to set these trends (or at least to identify them so early that they aren’t even really trends yet, and use his celebrity to push them into the mainstream). And whether that’s true or not, it’s obvious that he believes it to be so. He thinks he’s more than a pop star. I’m starting to agree with him.

Anyway, here is what I think about the album:

808s & Heartbreak, much like Outkast’s Speakerboxxx / The Love Below, is shamelessly self-indulgent and weird. That pisses off a lot of people, especially those who thought they had Kanye figured out and see this as a pathetic, inauthentic shift in persona. But you know, I admire it, whether it’s successful or not—it would have been incredibly easy for Kanye to half-heartedly make another hip-hop album 2/3 as good as his last two. He would have made plenty of money, and nobody would have been any more critical than to say “he’s lost a step.” But he went ahead and got even weirder than he already was1—pretty much completely abandoning rapping and most of the other touchstones of hip-hop and really embracing his stranger obsessions.

I’m reminded of Radiohead’s not-so-abrupt transition from standard (though excellent!) rock band to electronic experimentalists (Paranoid Android started it, Kid A and Amnesiac cemented it). They embraced some really weird stuff musically, and by sheer force of their popularity dragged a whole lot of people along with them. How many people were confronted with avant-garde push-the-envelope music because Radiohead basically made them listen to it? It seems to me that Kanye is trying to do the same thing here, except that there’s not really any blueprint for getting from rap to whatever 808s & Heartbreak is—at least not one that doesn’t end up making the artist look like an idiot. Still, for the most part I think it’s very successful.

Okay, so I’ll say a little bit about the actual songs on the album, rather than speak in generalities for the entire post. “Love Lockdown” is old news at this point, but it’s a pretty incredible piece of music, almost as weird and catchy as “Hey Ya!” (which I’d say is to the ‘00s so far what “Beat It” was to the ‘80s—the best song of the decade). “Heartless“, the second single, is pretty good—great hook, a bit of actual rapping from Mr. West—but as a “that woman is such a bitch” song, I’ve got to say, it’s sorta well-trod and not particularly interesting territory. “See You in My Nightmares” features the best rapper alive, Lil Wayne, so I automatically love it. But more objectively, it’s pretty silly, and Lil Wayne is not the best auto-tune user in the entire world (and he might be a little obsessed with the scatological). No matter, I still like it. “RoboCop” is pretty much an embarrassment and I wish I had a time machine to go back and convince Paul Verhoeven not to make the movie just so Kanye would have no inspiration for this annoying waste of time.2 “Coldest Winter” is a pretty good song that ends with some seriously primal percussion. The album closer, “Pinocchio Story”, is pretty listenable. But more importantly, I agree with Ann Powers that it basically lays out the central conceit of the album—the struggle Kanye has to maintain his humanity (and his actual individuality) amidst the all-encompassing demands of his celebrity.

As a musical work, I think it’s very much up for discussion whether 808s & Heartbreak is a success. But as a meaningful cultural artifact, I think the simple fact that it can engender this kind of conversation demonstrates that Kanye has really accomplished something here.

(Recommended.)

1 Kanye is exemplary of a general trend in hip-hop—these guys are getting a lot more willing to experiment with their work. While I have no doubt that has always been true of fringe, or even semi-popular, hip-hop, it wasn’t until Timbaland, Kanye, Eminem, and Outkast (among others) that truly popular hip-hop expanded, both musically and thematically. It’s a Good Thing.

2 Which would be a big sacrifice, because RoboCop is a pretty awesome movie.

It’s just a Chuck Norris cameo away from greatness.

Date November 29, 2008

I hope you all (well, the Americans among you) had a wonderful Thanksgiving. This is an ad for a Bruce Lee edition of a technology product. It is a shameless appeal to internet dorks, begging them to embed it on their blogs. And it’s working.

And furthermore…

[Geekologie via itchymutt]

It might seem wrong but it’s just right.

Date November 22, 2008

In other news, I passed the bar.

Especially if you’re in Ohio, Pennsylvania, or Florida.

Date November 2, 2008

Thoughts:

  • Leonardo DiCaprio is rapidly gaining on Christian Slater for best permanent Jack Nicholson impression.

  • Tom Cruise is still creepy. I guess that will never go away.

  • Borat is still funny. I guess that will never go away.

  • Harrison Ford is better than Shia LeBoeuf will ever be, but that freaking earring is ridiculous!

  • And yeah, vote on Tuesday. Even though, statistically, most of your votes really are worthless.

Wassup with you?

Date October 26, 2008

Sorry if you’ve already seen this. I was delayed in posting it because I was watching the Redskins win an ugly one in Detroit. Go Skins.

Are the Redskins a Good Football Team?

Date October 22, 2008

It’s been a while since I posted anything substantive. Why start now? Instead, let’s talk about the Redskins for 1500 words or so.


First of all, let me just say that no matter how this season ends up, I am really enjoying the way this team plays under Jim Zorn. They dominate the line on offense, run right up the gut, and take their shots with deep passes and trick plays often enough to keep opposing defenses guessing. On the other side of the ball, they are playing confident, aggressive defense, making it very difficult for their opponents to put up points.


Here are some factors that I find to be very positive about the season so far:


  • Clinton Portis (and the offensive line). Is Clinton Portis a new man? It’s hard to say. I think he’s been playing this well ever since Joe Gibbs arrived, but now he’s running behind an experienced, smart, enthusiastic (more on this below) offensive line, and his head coach is really calling on him to establish the parameters of the entire offense—run to set up the pass, run to set up the wacky gadget play, run to set up more damn running. From what little I understand about the NFL running back mindset, it seems like Portis is really responding to the confidence the team is showing in his abilities. It doesn’t hurt that his backups, Betts and Cartwright (and maybe, but probably not, Sean Alexander) beat the crap out of the other team when they get in the game. And he is great at picking up the blitz on passing plays. I love watching him lay out linebackers.


  • Defense.What can I say? They’ve been pretty great. They came up huge in the Dallas and Philadelphia games, shutting down explosive offenses and really demoralizing those teams. The line is great against the run, and puts a decent amount of pressure on the quarterback


  • ZORN. I wasn’t particularly happy to see Joe Gibbs go—he had a rough start, to say the least, but after a while his personnel and his game plans came around to something kind of like the Super-Bowl-winning teams he coached in my youth. Jim Zorn came in and did something very interesting: he didn’t mess with things too much. He took a hard-running, tough team, and stuck with its strengths. As far as I can tell, he doesn’t touch the defense, letting Blache take care of it. The results on that speak for themselves. And on offense, he’s interpolated his own playcalling preferences—quick passes aimed at creating yards-after-catch, and quirky gadget plays taking advantage of his personnel—with what the team has been doing well for a few years (running the ball down opponents’ throats). He hasn’t been perfect—his time management in the two-minute drill is still pretty questionable, for example—but for a guy in a head coaching position for the first time ever he’s done a great job.


Read the rest of this entry »

re: SNL

Date October 19, 2008

Instead of being funny, let’s just skip the jokes and pack the first 15 minutes with celebrity cameos! EVERYONE WILL THINK WE’RE GREAT.

PS: Remember G.E. Smith? He was awesome.

Consider the post-ironic reference made.

Date September 14, 2008

I don’t really know what to say, any more than anyone else does, but I think I’ve got to say something.

I was lucky enough to take a couple of classes with David Wallace at Pomona. I had already read Infinite Jest and a bunch of his non-fiction by then, and I fought for a place in his literature and writing classes. I’m glad I did, because he was as thoughtful, diligent, and smart as a teacher as he was as a writer. I learned a lot from him about writing (among other things, I learned that I should probably let other people handle the writing), but I learned at least as much about kindness, honesty, and humility. Writing is hard work, but so is literary criticism—and teaching a litter of undergrads either one is surely harder than both combined. I came out of that lucky year with at least as much admiration for Wallace the man as for Wallace the auteur.

In the wake of his death, I’ve been in touch with a few of my classmates from those courses, and we’re all simply shocked—by the death itself, and by the manner in which it occurred. Wallace seemed like a man whose darkest days were behind him; he had stared down many demons, and we all thought he had come out on top. But I guess he taught us better than to accept the superficial without probing deeper.

It’s a terrible loss for the literary world, of course, but for many people it’s much more than that. Through his writing, through his teaching, and through his character, Dave touched a lot of people in a way that belies his (ill-considered) reputation as an ironist. We’ll miss him very much.